Amid the ongoing month of Ramzan, Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami found himself at the center of a heated debate after he was seen drinking an energy drink during the Champions Trophy semi-final against Australia at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium. Shami, who chose not to observe Roza (fasting) due to the physical demands of playing professional cricket, has received both criticism and support from various quarters.
The controversy gained momentum when Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, President of All India Muslim Jamaat, called Shami “a criminal” for not keeping the fast. Speaking to ANI, Maulana Bareilvi stated:
“One of the compulsory duties is ‘Roza’. If any healthy man or woman doesn’t observe ‘Roza’, they are committing a crime in the eyes of Shariat. Mohammed Shami was seen drinking water during the match, and this sends a wrong message to people.”
In response, Congress leader Shama Mohamed stepped forward to defend the cricketer, highlighting the flexibility within Islamic teachings regarding fasting, especially for those who are traveling or engaged in physically demanding activities like sports.
“In Islam, there is a very important provision during Ramzan — when we are traveling, we don’t need to fast. Mohammed Shami was not at his home, he was playing a crucial match, and it’s natural for a player to feel thirsty. Islam is a very scientific religion, and ultimately, it is your deeds that matter the most.”
Shama Mohamed’s remarks emphasized the idea that religious practices should not be judged in isolation, especially when there are clear allowances within faith for such situations.
Shami has yet to respond publicly to the controversy, choosing instead to focus on his cricketing commitments. The 34-year-old pacer has been a vital part of Team India’s bowling attack, and his performance in the Champions Trophy has drawn praise from fans and experts alike.
The debate has sparked a broader conversation about the intersection of faith, personal choices, and professional responsibilities — with many voices urging respect for individual decisions and the nuanced teachings of religion.
What are your thoughts on this controversy? Should athletes be judged for choosing not to fast during intense competitions, or should there be more understanding about their physical demands? Let’s discuss!